Received Feb 3, 2025
| Type | Name | Manufacturer | Dose | Lot | Route / Site |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COVID19 | COVID19 (COVID19 (PFIZER-BIONTECH)) | PFIZER\BIONTECH | 2 | EW0169 | — |
| COVID19 | COVID19 (COVID19 (PFIZER-BIONTECH)) | PFIZER\BIONTECH | 2 | EW0169 | — |
she ended up getting covid; she ended up getting covid; the first was done on 31Jul2021/the second dose was on 13Aug2021; This is a spontaneous report received from a Consumer or other non HCP from medical information team. A 40-year-old female patient received BNT162b2 (BNT162B2), on 31Jul2021 as dose 1, single (Lot number: EW0158) and on 13Aug2021 as dose 2, single (Lot number: EW0169) for covid-19 immunisation. The patient's relevant medical history included: "throwing up" (unspecified if ongoing); "sick with asthma attacks", start date: 2019 (unspecified if ongoing); "sick with asthma attacks", start date: 2019 (unspecified if ongoing). The patient's concomitant medications were not reported. The following information was reported: INAPPROPRIATE SCHEDULE OF PRODUCT ADMINISTRATION (medically significant) with onset 13Aug2021, outcome "unknown", described as "the first was done on 31Jul2021/the second dose was on 13Aug2021"; COVID-19 (medically significant), DRUG INEFFECTIVE (medically significant) all with onset Dec2021, outcome "unknown" and all described as "she ended up getting covid". The patient underwent the following laboratory tests and procedures: SARS-CoV-2 test: (06Jan2022) positive. Clinical course: The vaccine from what she understands is supposed to prevent her from getting covid or that is what they said to dupe us all into getting it and she ended up getting covid. She got covid and it is a serious issue and has so much records from clinic and spoke to so many doctors. She tested positive for covid on 06Jan2022 and the vaccines were before that which is strange as she was not supposed to get covid right away but had the vaccines then and thinks it takes a few weeks to kick in and the covid was diagnosed but probably began in Dec2021 but the positive test was not until 06Jan2022 and she thinks she contracted it in Dec2021. So about 4 months later she got covid which is strange and the data suggested the vaccine could actually cause covid which is distressing.; Sender's Comments: Linked Report(s) : US-PFIZER INC-202500020504 same patient, different event, different dose of vaccine;
Medical History/Concurrent Conditions: Asthmatic attack; Sickness; Vomiting
Test Date: 20220106; Test Name: covid; Test Result: Positive