Received Feb 10, 2025
| Type | Name | Manufacturer | Dose | Lot | Route / Site |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VARZOS | ZOSTER (SHINGRIX) | GLAXOSMITHKLINE BIOLOGICALS | 1 | HA5HL | — |
gave a 33 years old a Shingrix; supposed to give a varicella vaccine, and they gave a Shingrix instead; This non-serious case was reported by a nurse via call center representative and described the occurrence of inappropriate age at vaccine administration in a 33-year-old female patient who received Herpes zoster (Shingrix) (batch number HA5HL, expiry date 13-NOV-2026) for prophylaxis. Co-suspect products included Varicella zoster vaccine (Varicella vaccine) for prophylaxis. On 22-JAN-2025, the patient received the 1st dose of Shingrix. On an unknown date, the patient did not receive Varicella vaccine. On 22-JAN-2025, an unknown time after receiving Shingrix, the patient experienced inappropriate age at vaccine administration (Verbatim: gave a 33 years old a Shingrix) and wrong vaccine administered (Verbatim: supposed to give a varicella vaccine, and they gave a Shingrix instead). The outcome of the inappropriate age at vaccine administration and wrong vaccine administered were unknown. Additional Information: GSK Receipt Date: 03-FEB-2025 The nurse had a medical assistant that actually gave a 33 years old patient a Shingrix which led to inappropriate ae at vaccine administration, and he/she need to know if that was gonna harm that patient at all. The nurse reported it was supposed to give a varicella vaccine, and they gave a Shingrix instead which led to wrong vaccine administered. Also, the nurse mentioned that the patient was not immunocompromised. The Vaccine Administration Facility was the same as Primary Reporter.