VAERS Explorer
Back to explore

Report #2825672

Received Feb 11, 2025

A note on interpretation. VAERS reports are unverified and may be incomplete or coincidental. A report does not establish that a vaccine caused an event, and counts should not be used to calculate incidence or infer causation. Full disclaimer

Overview

Sex
Female
Age
Age unknown
State
NC
Recovered
Unknown
Vaccinated
Oct 26, 2024
Onset
Jan 28, 2025
Days to onset
94
Hospital days
—

Vaccines (1)

TypeNameManufacturerDoseLotRoute / Site
UNKVACCINE NOT SPECIFIED (NO BRAND NAME)UNKNOWN MANUFACTURERUNK946624RA

Symptoms (2)

InfluenzaInfluenza A virus test positive

Symptom narrative

Diagnosed with the flu A; This spontaneous case initially received on 30-Jan-2025, was reported by a non health professional and concerns a child female patient. Medical history or concomitant medications were reported as unknown. No allergy information provided. There was no product complaint associated with this case. Administration of company suspect drug: On 26-Oct-2024, the patient received Flucelvax (TIV) for Flu immunization, Dose regimen: 0.5 ml, Route of administration: not reported, anatomical location: right deltoid Lot number: 946624. No additional suspect drugs. Adverse reactions/events and outcomes: On 28-Jan-2025, the patient experienced Diagnosed with the flu A (Medically Significant, outcome: Unknown). The reporter informed that her child was diagnosed with the flu during a trip to her pediatrician then. Vaccination was given at Health Services Clinic. Flu was verified by nasal swab. Flu virus was Flu A. Onset date was 28-Jan-2025 and Recovery date was 20-Jan-2025 (as reported). Source of infection was unknown (likely a peer at her school). Flucelvax (TIV) action taken: Not Applicable Treatment measures associated with event: Unknown Reporter assessment The reporter provide the seriousness of the event as unknown and did not provide a causality assessment.; Reporter's Comments: Due to the spontaneous nature of the case, it is considered related for reporting purposes. Causal association could not be completely ruled out in view of insufficient information, hence causality assessed as related.(relevant medical history, concomitant medications, diagnostic report)

Medical history

Comments: None