VAERS Explorer
Back to explore

Report #2826144

Received Feb 13, 2025

A note on interpretation. VAERS reports are unverified and may be incomplete or coincidental. A report does not establish that a vaccine caused an event, and counts should not be used to calculate incidence or infer causation. Full disclaimer

Overview

Sex
Female
Age
45 yrs
State
TX
Recovered
Unknown
Vaccinated
Jan 14, 2025
Onset
Jan 14, 2025
Days to onset
0
Hospital days
—

Vaccines (1)

TypeNameManufacturerDoseLotRoute / Site
MMRMEASLES + MUMPS + RUBELLA (PRIORIX)GLAXOSMITHKLINE BIOLOGICALSUNKA2J35IM

Symptoms (2)

Incorrect route of product administrationProduct administered to patient of inappropriate age

Symptom narrative

received a MMR vaccine intramuscularly; 45 years patient received Priorix vaccine; This non-serious case was reported by a nurse via call center representative and described the occurrence of subcutaneous injection formulation administered by other route in a 45-year-old female patient who received MMR (Priorix) (batch number A2J35, expiry date 01-SEP-2025) for prophylaxis. On 14-JAN-2025, the patient received Priorix (intramuscular, unknown deltoid). On 14-JAN-2025, an unknown time after receiving Priorix, the patient experienced subcutaneous injection formulation administered by other route (Verbatim: received a MMR vaccine intramuscularly) and inappropriate age at vaccine administration (Verbatim: 45 years patient received Priorix vaccine). The outcome of the subcutaneous injection formulation administered by other route and inappropriate age at vaccine administration were unknown. This report is made by GSK without prejudice and does not imply any admission or liability for the incident or its consequences. Additional Information: GSK Receipt Date: 16-JAN-2025 The nurse practitioner reported that they had a patient who received a MMR vaccine (Priorix) two days ago and she received that yesterday. The reporter asked it was a live vaccine and was that correct and she received a MMR vaccine intramuscularly and she got it in the deltoid, which led to subcutaneous injection formulation administered by other route The reporter was told that it was not a live vaccine and she received it on the deltoid and was needing her varicella today which she could not give her if she received the MMR two days ago. The reporter asked that something that they need to repeat whether subcutaneously. The reporter asked do she need to wait and what was it that they need to do at that point, since it was administered incorrectly The patient received Priorix at inappropriate age which led to inappropriate age at vaccine administration.