VAERS Explorer
Back to explore

Report #2832766

Received Mar 24, 2025

A note on interpretation. VAERS reports are unverified and may be incomplete or coincidental. A report does not establish that a vaccine caused an event, and counts should not be used to calculate incidence or infer causation. Full disclaimer

Overview

Sex
Male
Age
1.3 yrs
State
HI
Recovered
Unknown
Vaccinated
Mar 18, 2025
Onset
Mar 18, 2025
Days to onset
0
Hospital days
—

Vaccines (1)

TypeNameManufacturerDoseLotRoute / Site
DTAPDTAP (DAPTACEL)SANOFI PASTEURUNK2CA77C1OT

Symptoms (3)

Exposure via skin contactNo adverse eventUnderdose

Symptom narrative

vaccine didn't go into the patient and it was noted on outside of the patient's leg with no reported adverse event; vaccine didn't go into the patient and it was noted on outside of the patient's leg with no reported adverse event; Initial information received on 19-Mar-2025 regarding an unsolicited valid non-serious case received from a other health professional. This case involves a 15 months old male patient who was receiving diphtheria-15/tetanus/5 AC pertussis vaccine [Daptacel] that didn't go into the patient and it was noted on outside of the patient's leg with no reported adverse event and vaccine didn't go into the patient and it was noted on outside of the patient's leg with no reported adverse event. The patient's past medical history, medical treatment(s), vaccination(s) and family history were not provided. On 18-Mar-2025, Caller reported that diphtheria-15/tetanus/5 AC pertussis vaccine, Suspension of injection, (Unknown strength) lot 2CA77C1 with expiry date 30-Apr-2025, for immunization, which didn't go into the patient and it was noted on outside of the patient's leg with no reported adverse event (accidental exposure to product) (exposure via skin contact). Reportedly. They were using the VanishPoint needle, a needle that retracts into the syringe after injection.They ended up giving the patient another dose of DAPTACEL yesterday after she discussed it with the doctor. Action taken was not applicable. This suspected adverse reaction report is submitted and classified as a medication error solely and exclusively to ensure the marketing authorization holder's compliance with the requirements set out in the Directive 2001/83/EC and Module VI of the Good Pharmacovigilance Practices. The classification as a medical error is in no way intended, nor should it be interpreted or construed as an allegation or claim made by the marketing authorization holder that any third party has contributed to or is to be held liable for the occurrence of this medication error.