VAERS Explorer
Back to explore

Report #2835201

Received Apr 9, 2025

A note on interpretation. VAERS reports are unverified and may be incomplete or coincidental. A report does not establish that a vaccine caused an event, and counts should not be used to calculate incidence or infer causation. Full disclaimer

Overview

Sex
Unknown
Age
Age unknown
State
NJ
Recovered
Unknown
Vaccinated
—
Onset
—
Days to onset
—
Hospital days
—

Vaccines (1)

TypeNameManufacturerDoseLotRoute / Site
HEPABHEP A + HEP B (TWINRIX)GLAXOSMITHKLINE BIOLOGICALS2——

Symptoms (1)

Inappropriate schedule of product administration

Symptom narrative

someone who was 6 months late for their second dose of Twinrix; This non-serious case was reported by a pharmacist via call center representative and described the occurrence of drug dose administration interval too long in a patient who received HAB (Twinrix) for prophylaxis. Previously administered products included Twinrix (received 1st dose on an unknown date). On an unknown date, the patient received the 2nd dose of Twinrix. On an unknown date, an unknown time after receiving Twinrix, the patient experienced drug dose administration interval too long (Verbatim: someone who was 6 months late for their second dose of Twinrix). The outcome of the drug dose administration interval too long was not applicable. This report is made by GSK without prejudice and does not imply any admission or liability for the incident or its consequences. Additional Information: GSK Receipt Date: 27-MAR-2025 The pharmacist called with inquiry and while in conversation said through a friend she heard of someone who was 6 months late for their second dose of Twinrix which led to drug dose administration interval too long.