VAERS Explorer
Back to explore

Report #2835634

Received Apr 10, 2025

A note on interpretation. VAERS reports are unverified and may be incomplete or coincidental. A report does not establish that a vaccine caused an event, and counts should not be used to calculate incidence or infer causation. Full disclaimer

Overview

Sex
Male
Age
25 yrs
State
MN
Recovered
Unknown
Vaccinated
Nov 25, 2024
Onset
Nov 25, 2024
Days to onset
0
Hospital days
—

Vaccines (5)

TypeNameManufacturerDoseLotRoute / Site
COVID19COVID19 (COVID19 (PFIZER-BIONTECH))PFIZER\BIONTECHUNKLN0589IM / LA
FLU3INFLUENZA (SEASONAL) (FLUARIX)GLAXOSMITHKLINE BIOLOGICALSUNKN737YIM / OT
HEPHEP B (ENGERIX-B)GLAXOSMITHKLINE BIOLOGICALS1PE9G5IM / RA
MMRMEASLES + MUMPS + RUBELLA (PRIORIX)GLAXOSMITHKLINE BIOLOGICALS14ZC23IM / LA
TDAPTDAP (BOOSTRIX)GLAXOSMITHKLINE BIOLOGICALS14799GIM / OT

Symptoms (2)

Incorrect route of product administrationNo adverse event

Symptom narrative

I noticed when doing a routine chart audit for vaccines that the Priorix MMR vaccine was given intramuscularly, when it should only be given subcutaneously. When I asked the nurse who administered the vaccines about this, she did not report any adverse events or outcomes at the time of vaccination. I called GSK and they had internal studies suggesting it is still more than 96% effective when given IM and immunize.org suggests that the dose does not need to be repeated. We did attempt to contact the patient to follow-up and have not yet gotten a hold of them. I also noticed when auditing the chart that the nurse gave two vaccines (influenza and Tdap) in the gluteus muscle. This is not a preferred site, but per immunize.org should still count as valid. I reviewed vaccination technique with this nurse, including how to give up to three IM injections in each deltoid. I also reviewed that Priorix should only be give subcutaneously.