VAERS Explorer
Back to explore

Report #2840374

Received May 12, 2025

A note on interpretation. VAERS reports are unverified and may be incomplete or coincidental. A report does not establish that a vaccine caused an event, and counts should not be used to calculate incidence or infer causation. Full disclaimer

Overview

Sex
Unknown
Age
Age unknown
State
—
Recovered
Unknown
Vaccinated
—
Onset
—
Days to onset
—
Hospital days
—

Vaccines (1)

TypeNameManufacturerDoseLotRoute / Site
FLUR4INFLUENZA (SEASONAL) (FLUBLOK QUADRIVALENT)PROTEIN SCIENCES CORPORATIONUNK—OT

Symptoms (1)

Vaccination failure

Symptom narrative

During the market research interview participant mentioned that Flublok was seen to not to be as efficacious as it was before; Initial information received on 22-Apr-2025 regarding an unsolicited valid serious case received from a other health professional. This case involves market research interview participant mentioned that Influenza quadrivalent recombinant vaccine [Flublok QIV] was seen to not to be as efficacious as it was before. The patient's past medical history, medical treatment(s), vaccination(s) and family history were not provided. On an unknown date, the patient received an unknown dose of suspect Influenza quadrivalent recombinant vaccine (lot number, formulation and strength-unknown) via intramuscular route in unknown administration site for Prophylactic vaccination (Immunisation) and was seen to not to be as efficacious as it was before (Suspected clinical vaccine failure). Action taken was not applicable. Seriousness Criteria-The event is assessed as medically significant.; Sender's Comments: Sanofi company comment dated 29-APR-2025: This case involves market research interview participant mentioned that Influenza quadrivalent recombinant vaccine [Flublok QIV] was seen to not to be as efficacious as it was before. Further information regarding regarding allergic history, medical history, concomitant medication and tolerance, laboratory investigations excluding alternative etiologies for the reported event are needed to fully assess this case. Based upon the reported information, the role of the suspect vaccine cannot be assessed.