VAERS Explorer
Back to explore

Report #2840381

Received May 12, 2025

A note on interpretation. VAERS reports are unverified and may be incomplete or coincidental. A report does not establish that a vaccine caused an event, and counts should not be used to calculate incidence or infer causation. Full disclaimer

Overview

Sex
Female
Age
2 yrs
State
ME
Recovered
Unknown
Vaccinated
Apr 22, 2025
Onset
Apr 22, 2025
Days to onset
0
Hospital days
—

Vaccines (2)

TypeNameManufacturerDoseLotRoute / Site
DTAPDTAP (DAPTACEL)SANOFI PASTEURUNK3CA11C1OT
DTAPIPVDTAP + IPV (QUADRACEL)SANOFI PASTEURUNKU8009ABOT

Symptoms (2)

Extra dose administeredNo adverse event

Symptom narrative

2-year-old QUADRACEL with DAPTACEL, so patient received two DTap with no reported adverse event; Initial information received on 22-Apr-2025 regarding an unsolicited valid non-serious case received from a other health professional. This case involves a 2 years old female patient who had received Diphtheria-15/Tetanus/5 Hybrid Ac Pertussis/Ipv (Vero) Vaccine [Quadracel (Vero)] And Diphtheria-15/Tetanus/5 Ac Pertussis Vaccine [Daptacel], so the patient received two dtap with no reported adverse event. The patient's past medical history, medical treatment(s), vaccination(s) and family history were not provided. On 22-Apr-2025, the patient received doses with dosage 0.5 ml of suspects Diphtheria-15/Tetanus/5 Hybrid Ac Pertussis/Ipv (Vero) Vaccine Suspension for injection (lot U8009AB, Expiry: 31-Jan-2026) and Diphtheria-15/Tetanus/5 Ac Pertussis Vaccine Suspension for injection (lot 3CA11C1, Expiry: 31-DEC-2025) (Strength: Standard) via unknown route in unknown administration site as immunization, so patient received two dtap with no reported adverse event (extra dose administered) (Latency: same day). Reportedly, Reporter is calling to make there is no reaction or anything. Action taken: not applicable. This suspected adverse reaction report is submitted and classified as a medication error solely and exclusively to ensure the marketing authorization holder's compliance with the requirements set out in the Directive 2001/83/EC and Module VI of the Good Pharmacovigilance Practices. The classification as a medical error is in no way intended, nor should it be interpreted or construed as an allegation or claim made by the marketing authorization holder that any third party has contributed to or is to be held liable for the occurrence of this medication error.; Sender's Comments: US-SA-2025SA119219: