VAERS Explorer
Back to explore

Report #2840789

Received May 13, 2025

A note on interpretation. VAERS reports are unverified and may be incomplete or coincidental. A report does not establish that a vaccine caused an event, and counts should not be used to calculate incidence or infer causation. Full disclaimer

Overview

Sex
Unknown
Age
Age unknown
State
AZ
Recovered
Unknown
Vaccinated
—
Onset
—
Days to onset
—
Hospital days
—

Vaccines (1)

TypeNameManufacturerDoseLotRoute / Site
MENBMENINGOCOCCAL B (BEXSERO)NOVARTIS VACCINES AND DIAGNOSTICSUNK——

Symptoms (1)

Wrong product administered

Symptom narrative

Wrong vaccine administered; This non-serious case was reported by a consumer via call center representative and described the occurrence of wrong vaccine administered in a 11-year-old patient who received Men B NVS (Bexsero) for prophylaxis. Co-suspect products included Men ACWY-CRM NVS (Menveo) for prophylaxis and Meningococcal vaccine A/C/Y/W conj (tet tox) (Menquadfi) for prophylaxis. On an unknown date, the patient received Bexsero, did not receive Menveo and Menquadfi. On an unknown date, an unknown time after receiving Bexsero and not applicable after receiving Menveo, the patient experienced wrong vaccine administered (Verbatim: Wrong vaccine administered). The outcome of the wrong vaccine administered was not applicable. This report is made by GSK without prejudice and does not imply any admission or liability for the incident or its consequences. Additional Information: GSK Receipt Date: 07-MAY-2025 The GSK Representative explained that a Pediatrician mentioned that an 11 year old patient received a Bexsero vaccine instead of MenQuadfi or Menveo, but GSK Representative did not have further details for the adverse event report which led to wrong vaccine administered. Outbound call placed to get further adverse event details, no answer, agent left a voicemail with case number. They would send a follow up email to safety team in case that they were able to contact the physician later.