VAERS Explorer
Back to explore

Report #2841181

Received May 15, 2025

A note on interpretation. VAERS reports are unverified and may be incomplete or coincidental. A report does not establish that a vaccine caused an event, and counts should not be used to calculate incidence or infer causation. Full disclaimer

Overview

Sex
Male
Age
Age unknown
State
NY
Recovered
Unknown
Vaccinated
Apr 23, 2025
Onset
Apr 23, 2025
Days to onset
0
Hospital days
—

Vaccines (1)

TypeNameManufacturerDoseLotRoute / Site
MMRMEASLES + MUMPS + RUBELLA (PRIORIX)GLAXOSMITHKLINE BIOLOGICALSUNK——

Symptoms (1)

Incorrect route of product administration

Symptom narrative

adult patient was given the Priorix vaccine IM instead of SC; This non-serious case was reported by a pharmacist via call center representative and described the occurrence of subcutaneous injection formulation administered by other route in a 47-year-old male patient who received MMR (Priorix) for prophylaxis. On 23-APR-2025, the patient received Priorix. On 23-APR-2025, an unknown time after receiving Priorix, the patient experienced subcutaneous injection formulation administered by other route (Verbatim: adult patient was given the Priorix vaccine IM instead of SC). The outcome of the subcutaneous injection formulation administered by other route was not applicable. This report is made by GSK without prejudice and does not imply any admission or liability for the incident or its consequences. Additional Information: GSK Receipt Date: 05-MAY-2025 A pharmacist reported that an adult patient was given the Priorix vaccine IM instead of SC, which led to subcutaneous injection formulation administered by another route. The pharmacist asked if the dose was valid. The pharmacist did not provided information about Priorix dose. The reporter Consented to follow up.