VAERS Explorer
Back to explore

Report #2843939

Received Jun 4, 2025

A note on interpretation. VAERS reports are unverified and may be incomplete or coincidental. A report does not establish that a vaccine caused an event, and counts should not be used to calculate incidence or infer causation. Full disclaimer

Overview

Sex
Male
Age
Age unknown
State
—
Recovered
Unknown
Vaccinated
—
Onset
—
Days to onset
—
Hospital days
—

Vaccines (1)

TypeNameManufacturerDoseLotRoute / Site
TDTD ADSORBED (TENIVAC)SANOFI PASTEURUNK—OT

Symptoms (1)

Product storage error

Symptom narrative

was administered with the vaccine to 0.5 ml that had been exposed to minus 0.8 degree Celsius for less than 10 minutes with no reported adverse event; was administered with the vaccine to 0.5 ml that had been exposed to minus 0.8 degree Celsius for less than 10 minutes with no reported adverse event; Initial information received on 29-May-2025 regarding an unsolicited valid non-serious case received from a other health professional. This case was linked to US-SA-2025SA155611. This case involves an unknown age male patient who was administered with diphtheria-2/tetanus-5 adsorbed toxoids no preservative adult [Tenivac] to 0.5 ml that had been exposed to minus 0.8 degree celsius for less than 10 minutes with no reported adverse event. The patient's past medical history, medical treatment(s), vaccination(s) and family history were not provided. On an unknown date in 2024, the patient received a 0.5 ml dose of suspect diphtheria-2/tetanus-5 adsorbed toxoids no preservative adult that has been exposed to minus 0.8 degree celsius for less than 10 minutes with no reported adverse event (poor quality product administered) (product storage error) (Latency: same day) (route, lot number, strength and expiry date not reported) via unknown route in unknown administration site for prophylactic vaccination (Immunisation). Information on the batch number was requested corresponding to the one at time of event occurrence. Action taken was not applicable. This suspected adverse reaction report is submitted and classified as a medication error solely and exclusively to ensure the marketing authorization holder's compliance with the requirements set out in the Directive 2001/83/EC and Module VI of the Good Pharmacovigilance Practices. The classification as a medical error is in no way intended, nor should it be interpreted or construed as an allegation or claim made by the marketing authorization holder that any third party has contributed to or is to be held liable for the occurrence of this medication error.; Sender's Comments: US-SA-2025SA155611:Patient 2