VAERS Explorer
Back to explore

Report #2845229

Received Jun 16, 2025

A note on interpretation. VAERS reports are unverified and may be incomplete or coincidental. A report does not establish that a vaccine caused an event, and counts should not be used to calculate incidence or infer causation. Full disclaimer

Overview

Sex
Female
Age
5 yrs
State
TN
Recovered
Unknown
Vaccinated
Jun 11, 2025
Onset
Jun 11, 2025
Days to onset
0
Hospital days
—

Vaccines (1)

TypeNameManufacturerDoseLotRoute / Site
DTAPIPVHIBDTAP + IPV + HIB (PENTACEL)SANOFI PASTEUR5UK224ACOT / LL

Symptoms (2)

No adverse eventProduct administered to patient of inappropriate age

Symptom narrative

a 5 year and 1-day old patient was given PENTACEL with no reported adverse event; Initial information received on 11-Jun-2025 regarding an unsolicited valid non-serious case received from a other health professional. This case involves a 5 years and 1 day old female patient who received diphtheria/tetanus/5 hybrid AC pertussis/IPV(VERO)/HIB(PRP/T) vaccine [Pentacel (vero)] with no reported adverse event. The patient's past medical history, medical treatment(s), vaccination(s) and family history were not provided. Concomitant medications included measles vaccine live (enders-edmonston), mumps vaccine live (jeryl lynn), rubella vaccine live (wistar ra 27/3), varicella zoster vaccine live (oka/merck) (Proquad) for prophylactic vaccination (Immunisation). On 11-Jun-2025, the patient received a dose of 0.5 ml (dose 5) of suspect diphtheria/tetanus/5 hybrid AC pertussis/IPV(VERO)/HIB(PRP/T) vaccine, suspension for injection (lot UK224AC and expiry date 31-Jul-2026) (strength: standard and frequency: once) via intramuscular route in the left thigh for immunization with no reported adverse event (product administered to patient of inappropriate age) (Latency: same day). Action taken was not applicable. This suspected adverse reaction report is submitted and classified as a medication error solely and exclusively to ensure the marketing authorization holder's compliance with the requirements set out in the Directive 2001/83/EC and Module VI of the Good Pharmacovigilance Practices. The classification as a medical error is in no way intended, nor should it be interpreted or construed as an allegation or claim made by the marketing authorization holder that any third party has contributed to or is to be held liable for the occurrence of this medication error.

Other medications

PROQUAD