VAERS Explorer
Back to explore

Report #2847204

Received Jun 25, 2025

A note on interpretation. VAERS reports are unverified and may be incomplete or coincidental. A report does not establish that a vaccine caused an event, and counts should not be used to calculate incidence or infer causation. Full disclaimer

Overview

Sex
Female
Age
1.1 yrs
State
SC
Recovered
Unknown
Vaccinated
May 20, 2025
Onset
May 20, 2025
Days to onset
0
Hospital days
—

Vaccines (1)

TypeNameManufacturerDoseLotRoute / Site
DTPPVHBHPBDTAP+IPV+HIB+HEPB (VAXELIS)MSP VACCINE COMPANYUNK—IM / LL

Symptoms (1)

Circumstance or information capable of leading to medication error

Symptom narrative

Adverse Event(s): On May 20, 2025, while I was present with my child, a potential vaccine administration error occurred. I was informed by staff member that the vaccine being administered was Vaxelis, despite previous documentation from an April 29 visit indicating my child was due for the Hepatitis A (Hep A) vaccine. I voiced this concern directly before administration, but provider proceeded with the vaccination regardless. Treatment: A vaccine was administered?initial documentation identified it as Vaxelis. This was later revised to show that Hep A had been given, but the patient portal still lists Vaxelis. No immediate physical symptoms or adverse reactions were observed following the vaccination. Outcome(s): The conflicting verbal and written information created significant confusion and concern about the accuracy of medical records and the vaccine received. While no physical symptoms have been reported to date, the documentation conflict and lack of confirmation procedures present a serious risk to patient safety and future care decisions. The issue remains unresolved in the digital health chart.

Current illness

N/A

Medical history

N/A

Other medications

N/A

Allergies

N/A

Lab data

No medical tests or laboratory results were conducted in direct response to the adverse event on May 20, 2025. Since no immediate physical symptoms or complications were observed following the vaccine administration, no blood work, diagnostic imaging, or clinical tests were deemed necessary at the time. The concerns raised were primarily related to documentation discrepancies, vaccine identification, and potential protocol violations, rather than observable medical symptoms.