VAERS Explorer
Back to explore

Report #2847664

Received Jun 27, 2025

A note on interpretation. VAERS reports are unverified and may be incomplete or coincidental. A report does not establish that a vaccine caused an event, and counts should not be used to calculate incidence or infer causation. Full disclaimer

Overview

Sex
Unknown
Age
Age unknown
State
—
Recovered
Recovered
Vaccinated
—
Onset
—
Days to onset
—
Hospital days
—

Vaccines (2)

TypeNameManufacturerDoseLotRoute / Site
VARZOSZOSTER (NO BRAND NAME)UNKNOWN MANUFACTURER2UNK—
VARZOSZOSTER (NO BRAND NAME)UNKNOWN MANUFACTURER1UNK—

Symptoms (3)

Herpes zosterInappropriate schedule of product administrationVaccination failure

Symptom narrative

suspected vaccination failure; developed shingles on the chest and stomach/went away in a couple of months; received the shingles shot at 60 and then at 62; This serious case was reported by a consumer via interactive digital media and described the occurrence of vaccination failure in a patient who received Herpes zoster (Shingles vaccine) for prophylaxis. Co-suspect products included Herpes zoster (Shingles vaccine) for prophylaxis. On an unknown date, the patient received the 2nd dose of Shingles vaccine and the 1st dose of Shingles vaccine. On an unknown date, an unknown time after receiving Shingles vaccine and Shingles vaccine, the patient experienced vaccination failure (Verbatim: suspected vaccination failure) (serious criteria GSK medically significant), shingles (Verbatim: developed shingles on the chest and stomach/went away in a couple of months) and drug dose administration interval too long (Verbatim: received the shingles shot at 60 and then at 62). The outcome of the vaccination failure was not reported and the outcome of the shingles was resolved and the outcome of the drug dose administration interval too long was not applicable. It was unknown if the reporter considered the vaccination failure and shingles to be related to Shingles vaccine and Shingles vaccine. The company considered the vaccination failure to be unrelated to Shingles vaccine and Shingles vaccine. It was unknown if the company considered the shingles to be related to Shingles vaccine and Shingles vaccine. Additional Information: GSK receipt date: 23-JUN-2025 This case was reported by a patient via interactive digital media. The patient reported that he/she had received the shingles shot at age 60 and again at 62, but he/she still developed shingles on his/her chest and stomach. Fortunately, it was mild, with no blisters, and the symptoms resolved within a couple of months. The patient received 2nd dose of Shingles vaccine, later than the recommended interval, which led to lengthening of vaccination schedule. This case was considered as suspected vaccination failure since the details regarding, time to onset and laboratory confirmation of shingles were unknown at the time of reporting.; Sender's Comments: Vaccination failure is a listed event which, due to the following criteria (insufficient information provided about the clinical description, time to onset and laboratory confirmation of disease) is considered unrelated to GSK Shingles vaccine (Dose 1 & 2).