Received Jul 16, 2025
| Type | Name | Manufacturer | Dose | Lot | Route / Site |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VARZOS | ZOSTER (NO BRAND NAME) | UNKNOWN MANUFACTURER | 2 | UNK | — |
| VARZOS | ZOSTER (NO BRAND NAME) | UNKNOWN MANUFACTURER | 1 | UNK | — |
Suspected vaccination failure; had the first dose of shots they came out with; they are back on / 2 cases back to back; years later I went back for the two part shots; This serious case was reported by a consumer via interactive digital media and described the occurrence of vaccination failure in a patient who received Herpes zoster (Shingles vaccine) for prophylaxis. Co-suspect products included Herpes zoster (Shingles vaccine) for prophylaxis. On an unknown date, the patient received the 2nd dose of Shingles vaccine and the 1st dose of Shingles vaccine. On an unknown date, an unknown time after receiving Shingles vaccine and Shingles vaccine, the patient experienced vaccination failure (Verbatim: Suspected vaccination failure) (serious criteria GSK medically significant), shingles (Verbatim: had the first dose of shots they came out with), shingles (Verbatim: they are back on / 2 cases back to back) and drug dose administration interval too long (Verbatim: years later I went back for the two part shots). The outcome of the vaccination failure, shingles and shingles were not reported and the outcome of the drug dose administration interval too long was not applicable. It was unknown if the reporter considered the vaccination failure, shingles and shingles to be related to Shingles vaccine and Shingles vaccine. The company considered the vaccination failure to be unrelated to Shingles vaccine and Shingles vaccine. It was unknown if the company considered the shingles and shingles to be related to Shingles vaccine and Shingles vaccine. Additional Information: GSK Receipt Date: 08-JUL-2025 This case was reported by a patient via interactive digital media. The reporter can always tell when mine are coming. They follow that same nerve pain & it is such awful pain. The patient had the first dose of shots they came out with. That didn't work so years later I went back for the two part shots which led to drug dose administration interval too long. They actually did work for 5 years but now they are back on 2 cases back to back. This case was considered as suspected vaccination failure as details regarding laboratory confirmation regarding shingles were unknown at the time of reporting.; Sender's Comments: Vaccination failure is a listed event which, due to the following criteria (insufficient information provided about the clinical description, time to onset and laboratory confirmation of disease) is considered unrelated to GSK vaccine Shingles vaccine (dose 1 and 2)