VAERS Explorer
Back to explore

Report #2851376

Received Jul 28, 2025

A note on interpretation. VAERS reports are unverified and may be incomplete or coincidental. A report does not establish that a vaccine caused an event, and counts should not be used to calculate incidence or infer causation. Full disclaimer

Overview

Sex
Female
Age
89 yrs
State
FL
Recovered
Unknown
Vaccinated
Jul 17, 2025
Onset
Jul 17, 2025
Days to onset
0
Hospital days
—

Vaccines (1)

TypeNameManufacturerDoseLotRoute / Site
RSVRSV (AREXVY)GLAXOSMITHKLINE BIOLOGICALSUNK4LM9F—

Symptoms (1)

Product preparation issue

Symptom narrative

didn't get the antigen of Arexvy, that is that only the diluent portion was injected to the patient./ administered the Adjuvant portion of AREXVY only; didn't get the antigen of Arexvy, that is that only the diluent portion was injected to the patient./ administered the Adjuvant portion of AREXVY only; This non-serious case was reported by a physician via call center representative and described the occurrence of inappropriate preparation of medication in a 89-year-old female patient who received RSVPreF3 adjuvanted (Arexvy) (batch number 4LM9F, expiry date 10-OCT-2026) for prophylaxis. On 17-JUL-2025, the patient received Arexvy. On 17-JUL-2025, an unknown time after receiving Arexvy, the patient experienced inappropriate preparation of medication (Verbatim: didn't get the antigen of Arexvy, that is that only the diluent portion was injected to the patient./ administered the Adjuvant portion of AREXVY only) and inappropriate dose of vaccine administered (Verbatim: didn't get the antigen of Arexvy, that is that only the diluent portion was injected to the patient./ administered the Adjuvant portion of AREXVY only). The outcome of the inappropriate preparation of medication and inappropriate dose of vaccine administered were not applicable. Additional Information: GSK Receipt Date: 18-JUL-2025 The patient was administered the Adjuvant portion of Arexvy only, which led to Inappropriate preparation of medication and inappropriate dose of vaccine administered. The lot number provided was from the adjuvant. The reporter did not have the lot from the antigen.