VAERS Explorer
Back to explore

Report #2853486

Received Aug 11, 2025

A note on interpretation. VAERS reports are unverified and may be incomplete or coincidental. A report does not establish that a vaccine caused an event, and counts should not be used to calculate incidence or infer causation. Full disclaimer

Overview

Sex
Female
Age
Age unknown
State
—
Recovered
Unknown
Vaccinated
—
Onset
—
Days to onset
—
Hospital days
—

Vaccines (1)

TypeNameManufacturerDoseLotRoute / Site
RSVRSV (AREXVY)GLAXOSMITHKLINE BIOLOGICALSUNKUNK—

Symptoms (4)

Exposure during pregnancyNo adverse eventProduct use issueWrong product administered

Symptom narrative

pregnant patient received Arexvy instead of Abrysvo; pregnant patient received Arexvy instead of Abrysvo within the health system; pregnant patient received Arexvy instead of Abrysvo; This non-serious prospective pregnancy case was reported by a pharmacist via sales rep and described the occurrence of vaccine exposure during pregnancy in a adult female patient who received RSVPreF3 adjuvanted (Arexvy) for prophylaxis. Co-suspect products included RSV vaccine prot. subunit PreF 2v (Abrysvo) for prophylaxis. On an unknown date, the patient received Arexvy. The patient did not receive Abrysvo. On an unknown date, an unknown time after receiving Arexvy, the patient experienced vaccine exposure during pregnancy (Verbatim: pregnant patient received Arexvy instead of Abrysvo), wrong vaccine administered (Verbatim: pregnant patient received Arexvy instead of Abrysvo within the health system) and product use in unapproved population (Verbatim: pregnant patient received Arexvy instead of Abrysvo). The outcome of the vaccine exposure during pregnancy, wrong vaccine administered and product use in unapproved population were not applicable. Pregnancy exposure: Pregnancy Exposure (Arexvy): Trimester unknown Pregnancy Exposure (Abrysvo): Trimester unknown Pregnancy Outcome: Pregnancy was ongoing Additional Information: GSK Receipt Date: 28-JUL-2025 The pregnant patient received Arexvy instead of Abrysvo within the health system which led to wrong vaccine administered, product use in unapproved population and vaccine exposure during pregnancy. No negative outcomes apparent at the time of reporting provided.