VAERS Explorer
Back to explore

Report #2853756

Received Aug 12, 2025

A note on interpretation. VAERS reports are unverified and may be incomplete or coincidental. A report does not establish that a vaccine caused an event, and counts should not be used to calculate incidence or infer causation. Full disclaimer

Overview

Sex
Female
Age
24 yrs
State
CT
Recovered
Unknown
Vaccinated
Jul 29, 2025
Onset
Jul 29, 2025
Days to onset
0
Hospital days
—

Vaccines (1)

TypeNameManufacturerDoseLotRoute / Site
MMRMEASLES + MUMPS + RUBELLA (PRIORIX)GLAXOSMITHKLINE BIOLOGICALSUNK57DD5IM

Symptoms (1)

Incorrect route of product administration

Symptom narrative

Priorix intramuscular instead of subcutaneous administration; This non-serious case was reported by a other health professional via call center representative and described the occurrence of subcutaneous injection formulation administered by other route in a 24-year-old female patient who received MMR (Priorix) (batch number 57DD5, expiry date 01-DEC-2026) for prophylaxis. On 29-JUL-2025, the patient received Priorix (intramuscular). On 29-JUL-2025, an unknown time after receiving Priorix, the patient experienced subcutaneous injection formulation administered by other route (Verbatim: Priorix intramuscular instead of subcutaneous administration). The outcome of the subcutaneous injection formulation administered by other route was not applicable. This report is made by GSK without prejudice and does not imply any admission or liability for the incident or its consequences. Additional Information: GSK receipt date: 04-AUG-2025 A Health Care Provider wanted to know how to proceed after administering Priorix intramuscularly instead of subcutaneously which led to subcutaneous injection formulation administration by other route.