VAERS Explorer
Back to explore

Report #2857760

Received Sep 10, 2025

A note on interpretation. VAERS reports are unverified and may be incomplete or coincidental. A report does not establish that a vaccine caused an event, and counts should not be used to calculate incidence or infer causation. Full disclaimer

Overview

Sex
Female
Age
12 yrs
State
TX
Recovered
Unknown
Vaccinated
Sep 5, 2025
Onset
Sep 5, 2025
Days to onset
0
Hospital days
—

Vaccines (1)

TypeNameManufacturerDoseLotRoute / Site
FLU3INFLUENZA (SEASONAL) (FLUZONE HIGH-DOSE)SANOFI PASTEUR1U8527AAOT

Symptoms (2)

Expired product administeredNo adverse event

Symptom narrative

administered with an expired fluzone hd vaccine with no reported advesre event; administered with an expired fluzone hd vaccine with no reported advesre event; Initial information received on 05-Sep-2025 regarding an unsolicited valid non-serious case received from a nurse. This case involves a 12 years old female patient who was administered with an expired influenza USP trival A-B high dose subvirion vaccine [Fluzone High Dose] with no reported advesre event. The patient's past medical history, medical treatment(s), vaccination(s) and family history were not provided. On 05-Sep-2025, the patient received 0.5 ml of dose 1 of an expired influenza USP trival A-B high dose subvirion vaccine Suspension for injection in pre-filled syringe with standard strength (expiry date- 30-JUN-2025 and lot U8527AA) once via intramuscular route in unknown administration site for Influenza immunization with no reported adverse event (expired product administered) (product administered to patient of inappropriate age) (latency- same day). Reportedly, List of concomitant vaccines: None. Treatment: No adverse event, no treatment Action taken was not applicable. This suspected adverse reaction report is submitted and classified as a medication error solely and exclusively to ensure the marketing authorization holder's compliance with the requirements set out in the Directive 2001/83/EC and Module VI of the Good Pharmacovigilance Practices. The classification as a medical error is in no way intended, nor should it be interpreted or construed as an allegation or claim made by the marketing authorization holder that any third party has contributed to or is to be held liable for the occurrence of this medication error.