VAERS Explorer
Back to explore

Report #2859498

Received Sep 17, 2025

A note on interpretation. VAERS reports are unverified and may be incomplete or coincidental. A report does not establish that a vaccine caused an event, and counts should not be used to calculate incidence or infer causation. Full disclaimer

Overview

Sex
Male
Age
11 yrs
State
IN
Recovered
Unknown
Vaccinated
Sep 12, 2025
Onset
Sep 12, 2025
Days to onset
0
Hospital days
—

Vaccines (1)

TypeNameManufacturerDoseLotRoute / Site
DTAPDTAP (DAPTACEL)SANOFI PASTEUR23CA11C1OT / LA

Symptoms (2)

No adverse eventWrong product administered

Symptom narrative

inadvertently administered Daptacel instead of Adacel to an otherwise fully vaccinated 11 year old male patient with no adverse event; Initial information received on 12-Sep-2025 regarding an unsolicited valid non-serious case received from a other health professional. This case involves a 11 years old male patient who was inadvertently administered DIPHTHERIA-15/TETANUS/5 AC PERTUSSIS VACCINE [DAPTACEL] instead of DIPHTHERIA-2/TETANUS/5 AC PERTUSSIS VACCINE [ADACEL] with no adverse event. The patient's past medical history, medical treatment(s), vaccination(s) and family history were not provided. Concomitant medications included Meningococcal vaccine A/C/Y/W conj (tet tox) (Menquadfi) for Immunisation. On 12-Sep-2025, the patient received dose 2 with dosage 0.5 ml of suspect DIPHTHERIA-15/TETANUS/5 AC PERTUSSIS VACCINE suspension for injection (lot 3CA11C1, Expiry Date: 31-Dec-2025) (Frequency: once, Strength: Standard) via intramuscular route in left deltoid as immunization instead of vaccine DIPHTHERIA-2/TETANUS/5 AC PERTUSSIS VACCINE Suspension for injection (lot number and expiry unknown) with no adverse event (wrong product administered) (Latency: same day) Action taken: not applicable. This suspected adverse reaction report is submitted and classified as a medication error solely and exclusively to ensure the marketing authorization holder's compliance with the requirements set out in the Directive 2001/83/EC and Module VI of the Good Pharmacovigilance Practices. The classification as a medical error is in no way intended, nor should it be interpreted or construed as an allegation or claim made by the marketing authorization holder that any third party has contributed to or is to be held liable for the occurrence of this medication

Other medications

Menquadfi