VAERS Explorer
Back to explore

Report #2864453

Received Oct 8, 2025

A note on interpretation. VAERS reports are unverified and may be incomplete or coincidental. A report does not establish that a vaccine caused an event, and counts should not be used to calculate incidence or infer causation. Full disclaimer

Overview

Sex
Female
Age
80 yrs
State
TN
Recovered
Unknown
Vaccinated
Oct 2, 2025
Onset
Oct 2, 2025
Days to onset
0
Hospital days
—

Vaccines (2)

TypeNameManufacturerDoseLotRoute / Site
TDTD ADSORBED (TENIVAC)SANOFI PASTEURUNK—OT
TDAPTDAP (ADACEL)SANOFI PASTEURUNK—OT

Symptoms (2)

No adverse eventWrong product administered

Symptom narrative

needed to get adacel but were administered with tenivac with no reported adverse event; Initial information received on 02-Oct-2025 regarding an unsolicited valid non-serious case received from a nurse. This case involves a 80-year-old female patient who needed to get diphtheria-2/tetanus/5 AC pertussis vaccine [Adacel] but were administered with diphtheria-2/tetanus-5 adsorbed toxoids no preservative adult [Tenivac] with no reported adverse event. The patient's past medical history, medical treatment(s), vaccination(s) and family history were not provided. Concomitant medications included Influenza vaccine (Flu) for Immunisation. On 02-Oct-2025, the patient needed to get Diphtheria-2/Tetanus/5 AC Pertussis Vaccine but were administered a 0.5 ml dose of suspect Diphtheria-2/Tetanus-5 Adsorbed Toxoids No Preservative Adult Suspension for injection Strength: Standard (expiry date, lot number not reported) via intramuscular route in the deltoid nos (not specified) for immunization with no reported adverse event (wrong product administered) (latency: on same day). Information regarding batch number corresponding to the one at time of event occurrence is requested. Action taken was not applicable. This suspected adverse reaction report is submitted and classified as a medication error solely and exclusively to ensure the marketing authorization holder's compliance with the requirements set out in the Directive 2001/83/EC and Module VI of the Good Pharmacovigilance Practices. The classification as a medical error is in no way intended, nor should it be interpreted or construed as an allegation or claim made by the marketing authorization holder that any third party has contributed to or is to be held liable for the occurrence of this medication error.

Other medications

Flu