VAERS Explorer
Back to explore

Report #2868118

Received Oct 24, 2025

A note on interpretation. VAERS reports are unverified and may be incomplete or coincidental. A report does not establish that a vaccine caused an event, and counts should not be used to calculate incidence or infer causation. Full disclaimer

Overview

Sex
Female
Age
Age unknown
State
—
Recovered
Unknown
Vaccinated
Oct 2, 2025
Onset
Oct 2, 2025
Days to onset
0
Hospital days
—

Vaccines (1)

TypeNameManufacturerDoseLotRoute / Site
FLU3INFLUENZA (SEASONAL) (FLULAVAL)GLAXOSMITHKLINE BIOLOGICALSUNKUNK—

Symptoms (1)

Wrong product administered

Symptom narrative

Fluad was ordered but patient administered Flulaval due to nursing error; This non-serious case was reported by a nurse via sales rep and described the occurrence of wrong vaccine administered in a 67-year-old female patient who received Flu Seasonal TIV Quebec (FluLaval 2025-2026 season) for prophylaxis. Co-suspect products included Influenza vaccine inact sAg 3v (Fluad) for prophylaxis. On 02-OCT-2025, the patient received FluLaval 2025-2026 season. The patient did not receive Fluad. On 02-OCT-2025, an unknown time after receiving FluLaval 2025-2026 season, the patient experienced wrong vaccine administered (Verbatim: Fluad was ordered but patient administered Flulaval due to nursing error). The outcome of the wrong vaccine administered was not applicable. This report is made by GSK without prejudice and does not imply any admission or liability for the incident or its consequences. Additional Information: GSK receipt date: 09-OCT-2025 The reporter stated that, Fluad was ordered but patient administered Flulaval due to nursing error, no system errors identified. Research Nurse did not have access to barcode scanning. The reporter did not consent to follow up. The batch number was not provided, and we are unable to contact the reporter.