VAERS Explorer
Back to explore

Report #2869872

Received Oct 31, 2025

A note on interpretation. VAERS reports are unverified and may be incomplete or coincidental. A report does not establish that a vaccine caused an event, and counts should not be used to calculate incidence or infer causation. Full disclaimer

Overview

Sex
Female
Age
1.3 yrs
State
—
Recovered
Unknown
Vaccinated
Oct 9, 2025
Onset
Oct 9, 2025
Days to onset
0
Hospital days
—

Vaccines (1)

TypeNameManufacturerDoseLotRoute / Site
DTAPIPVDTAP + IPV (KINRIX)GLAXOSMITHKLINE BIOLOGICALS4——

Symptoms (2)

Product administered to patient of inappropriate ageWrong product administered

Symptom narrative

Kinrix instead of DTaP administration in a 15 months-old patient; Kinrix instead of DTaP administration in a 15 months-old patient; received Kinrix instead of DTaP (as a 4th dose in the schedule); This non-serious case was reported by a physician via call center representative and described the occurrence of wrong vaccine administered in a 15-month-old female patient who received DTPa-IPV (Kinrix) for prophylaxis. Co-suspect products included DTPa (DTPa vaccine) for prophylaxis. On 09-OCT-2025, the patient received the 4th dose of Kinrix. The patient did not receive DTPa vaccine. On 09-OCT-2025, an unknown time after receiving Kinrix, the patient experienced wrong vaccine administered (Verbatim: Kinrix instead of DTaP administration in a 15 months-old patient), inappropriate age at vaccine administration (Verbatim: Kinrix instead of DTaP administration in a 15 months-old patient) and inappropriate schedule of vaccine administered (Verbatim: received Kinrix instead of DTaP (as a 4th dose in the schedule)). The outcome of the wrong vaccine administered, inappropriate age at vaccine administration and inappropriate schedule of vaccine administered were not applicable. This report is made by GSK without prejudice and does not imply any admission or liability for the incident or its consequences. Additional Information: GSK Receipt Date: 09-OCT-2025 A physician asked how to proceed. The vaccine administration facility was the same as primary reporter. Patients, initials, date of birth, vaccine lot and expiration date were unknown by the reporter. The batch number was not provided upon follow- up with the reporter.