VAERS Explorer
Back to explore

Report #2870365

Received Nov 3, 2025

A note on interpretation. VAERS reports are unverified and may be incomplete or coincidental. A report does not establish that a vaccine caused an event, and counts should not be used to calculate incidence or infer causation. Full disclaimer

Overview

Sex
Female
Age
73 yrs
State
IL
Recovered
Unknown
Vaccinated
Oct 15, 2025
Onset
Oct 22, 2025
Days to onset
7
Hospital days
—

Vaccines (2)

TypeNameManufacturerDoseLotRoute / Site
COVID19COVID19 (COVID19 (UNKNOWN))UNKNOWN MANUFACTURERUNK—OT
FLU3INFLUENZA (SEASONAL) (FLUZONE HIGH-DOSE)SANOFI PASTEUR2—OT

Symptoms (2)

Extra dose administeredWrong product administered

Symptom narrative

patient receiving fluzone hd again today when it was supposed to be the covid-19 vaccine with no reported ae; patient receiving fluzone hd again today when it was supposed to be the covid-19 vaccine with no reported ae; Initial information received on 22-Oct-2025 regarding an unsolicited valid non-serious case received from a other health professional. This case involves a 74 years old female patient who received Influenza Usp Trival A-B High Dose Subvirion Vaccine [Fluzone Hd] again today when it was supposed to be the COVID-19 vaccine with no reported adverse event. The patient's past medical history, medical treatment(s), vaccination(s) and family history were not provided. On 15-Oct-2025, the patient received (dose 1) of suspect Influenza Usp Trival A-B High Dose Subvirion Vaccine, Suspension for injection in pre-filled syringe and on 22-Oct-2025, she also received an unknown dose 0.5ml (dose 2) (lot U8855AA) (expiry date 30-Jun-2026 and strength high dose, frequency once) via unknown route in unknown administration site for prophylactic vaacination (Immunisation) and received fluzone hd again today when it was supposed to be COVID-19 Vaccine not produced by Sanofi Pasteur (formulation unknown) with no reported adverse event (extra dose administered) (wrong product administered) (latency 7 days). Action taken was not applicable. This suspected adverse reaction report is submitted and classified as a medication error solely and exclusively to ensure the marketing authorization holder's compliance with the requirements set out in the Directive 2001/83/EC and Module VI of the Good Pharmacovigilance Practices. The classification as a medical error is in no way intended, nor should it be interpreted or construed as an allegation or claim made by the marketing authorization holder that any third party has contributed to or is to be held liable for the occurrence of this medication error.; Sender's Comments: US-SA-2025SA316300:2nd patient