VAERS Explorer
Back to explore

Report #2875348

Received Nov 28, 2025

A note on interpretation. VAERS reports are unverified and may be incomplete or coincidental. A report does not establish that a vaccine caused an event, and counts should not be used to calculate incidence or infer causation. Full disclaimer

Overview

Sex
Unknown
Age
67 yrs
State
AL
Recovered
Unknown
Vaccinated
Jun 8, 2025
Onset
Jun 8, 2025
Days to onset
0
Hospital days
—

Vaccines (2)

TypeNameManufacturerDoseLotRoute / Site
HEPABHEP A + HEP B (TWINRIX)GLAXOSMITHKLINE BIOLOGICALS3P2443—
HEPABHEP A + HEP B (TWINRIX)GLAXOSMITHKLINE BIOLOGICALS2——

Symptoms (1)

Inappropriate schedule of product administration

Symptom narrative

Wrong Interval administration; Wrong Interval administration; This non-serious case was reported by a pharmacist via call center representative and described the occurrence of drug dose administration interval too short in a 67-year-old patient who received HAB (Twinrix) (batch number P2443, expiry date 18-SEP-2027) for prophylaxis. Co-suspect products included HAB (Twinrix) for prophylaxis. Concomitant products included HEPATITIS A VACCINE INACT;HEPATITIS B VACCINE RHBSAG (YEAST) (TWINRIX). On 30-AUG-2025, the patient received the 3rd dose of Twinrix. On 08-JUN-2025, the patient received the 2nd dose of Twinrix. On 08-JUN-2025, an unknown time after receiving Twinrix, the patient experienced drug dose administration interval too long (Verbatim: Wrong Interval administration). On 30-AUG-2025, the patient experienced drug dose administration interval too short (Verbatim: Wrong Interval administration). The outcome of the drug dose administration interval too short and drug dose administration interval too long were not applicable. This report is made by GSK without prejudice and does not imply any admission or liability for the incident or its consequences. Additional Information: GSK receipt date: 20-NOV-2025 The pharmacist called to get guidance for the Twinrix vaccine series. The patient got 3rd dose before 5 months. The reporter wanted to know if a booster dose was required or if the complete vaccine series had to be restarted. The vaccine administration facility was the same as primary reporter. This case was linked with case US2025150969 and US2025151087 reported by same reporter.; Sender's Comments: US-GSK-US2025150969:Same Reporter US-GSK-US2025151087:Same Reporter