VAERS Explorer
Back to explore

Report #2877338

Received Dec 11, 2025

A note on interpretation. VAERS reports are unverified and may be incomplete or coincidental. A report does not establish that a vaccine caused an event, and counts should not be used to calculate incidence or infer causation. Full disclaimer

Overview

Sex
Female
Age
7 yrs
State
PA
Recovered
Unknown
Vaccinated
Nov 20, 2025
Onset
Nov 20, 2025
Days to onset
0
Hospital days
—

Vaccines (1)

TypeNameManufacturerDoseLotRoute / Site
UNKVACCINE NOT SPECIFIED (NO BRAND NAME)UNKNOWN MANUFACTURERUNKU8832AAOT / LA

Symptoms (3)

No adverse eventProduct administered to patient of inappropriate ageWrong patient

Symptom narrative

7 years old patient received the flublok vaccine and it is intended for nine years old and up with no reported adverse event; Initial information received on 05-Dec-2025 regarding an unsolicited valid non-serious case received from a other health professional. This case involves a 7-year-old female patient who received the INFLUENZA TRIVALENT RECOMBINANT VACCINE [FLUBLOK TIV] and it is intended for nine years old and up with no reported adverse event. The patient's past medical history, medical treatment(s), vaccination(s) and family history were not provided. No other vaccines. On 20-Nov-2025, 7 years old patient received the 0.5 ml dose of Suspect Influenza Trivalent Recombinant Vaccine Solution for injection of lot U8832AA and expiry date: 31-May-2026 strength: standard via intramuscular route in the left deltoid for influenza immunisation and it is intended for nine years old and up with no reported adverse event (product administered to patient of inappropriate age) (latency: on same day). Action taken was not applicable. This suspected adverse reaction report is submitted and classified as a medication error solely and exclusively to ensure the marketing authorization holder's compliance with the requirements set out in the Directive 2001/83/EC and Module VI of the Good Pharmacovigilance Practices. The classification as a medical error is in no way intended, nor should it be interpreted or construed as an allegation or claim made by the marketing authorization holder that any third party has contributed to or is to be held liable for the occurrence of this medication error.