VAERS Explorer
Back to explore

Report #2878635

Received Dec 18, 2025

A note on interpretation. VAERS reports are unverified and may be incomplete or coincidental. A report does not establish that a vaccine caused an event, and counts should not be used to calculate incidence or infer causation. Full disclaimer

Overview

Sex
Male
Age
70 yrs
State
—
Recovered
Not recovered
Vaccinated
Sep 23, 2025
Onset
—
Days to onset
—
Hospital days
—

Vaccines (1)

TypeNameManufacturerDoseLotRoute / Site
COVID19COVID19 (COVID19 (MODERNA MNEXSPIKE))MODERNAUNK3052734IM

Symptoms (2)

DiplopiaMagnetic resonance imaging

Symptom narrative

double vision; This spontaneous case was reported by a consumer and describes the occurrence of DIPLOPIA (double vision) in a 70-year-old male patient who received mRNA-1283 (MNEXSPIKE PFS) (batch no. 3052734) for COVID-19 prophylaxis. The suspect product included Pre-filled Syringe injection (batch no. 3052734) for COVID-19 prophylaxis. No Medical History information was reported. On 23-Sep-2025, the patient received dose of mRNA-1283 (MNEXSPIKE PFS) (Intramuscular use) .2 milliliter. On an unknown date, the patient started Pre-filled Syringe (unknown route) at an unspecified dose. In 2025, the patient experienced DIPLOPIA (double vision). At the time of the report, DIPLOPIA (double vision) had not resolved. DIAGNOSTIC RESULTS (normal ranges are provided in parenthesis if available): On an unknown date, Magnetic resonance imaging: did not have stroke. The action taken with mRNA-1283 (MNEXSPIKE PFS) (Intramuscular use) was unknown. Concomitant medication was not provided. It was reported that the patient had received a COVID vaccine on 23-Sep and about a week later had started experiencing double vision. He had stated that he had not experienced any falls, blows to the head, or similar incidents. He had mentioned that he had spoken to doctors who suggested it could be related to the vaccine. The vaccine had been administered at a local Pharmacy. The patient had explained that he had been about to get a cup of coffee and read the newspaper when he suddenly felt something strange. He had gone to an optician, who was concerned that he might have had a stroke and therefore referred him to an ophthalmologist. A day later, he had undergone an MRI brain scan, which fortunately ruled out a stroke. He had reiterated that he had not fallen or suffered any head trauma, so there were no other variables involved. It was further reported that the symptoms had not resolved and that the patient was still dealing with them. He had visited the optician numerous times to try prism glasses to make the images appear as one, but this had not worked. He had described the situation as disconcerting. It was unknown if the patient experienced any additional symptoms or events. Treatment medication was not reported.

Lab data

Test Name: MRI; Result Unstructured Data: did not have stroke