VAERS Explorer
Back to explore

Report #2884403

Received Feb 5, 2026

A note on interpretation. VAERS reports are unverified and may be incomplete or coincidental. A report does not establish that a vaccine caused an event, and counts should not be used to calculate incidence or infer causation. Full disclaimer

Overview

Sex
Unknown
Age
Age unknown
State
FL
Recovered
Unknown
Vaccinated
Oct 1, 2025
Onset
Dec 1, 2025
Days to onset
61
Hospital days
—

Vaccines (1)

TypeNameManufacturerDoseLotRoute / Site
FLU3INFLUENZA (SEASONAL) (FLUZONE HIGH-DOSE)SANOFI PASTEUR1—OT

Symptoms (2)

Extra dose administeredNo adverse event

Symptom narrative

the patient received a dose in October and then a second dose at the end of December with no reported adverse event; Initial information received on 03-Feb-2026 regarding an unsolicited valid non-serious case received from a other health professional. This case involves an unknown age and gender patient who had received a dose of INFLUENZA USP TRIVAL A-B HIGH DOSE SUBVIRION VACCINE [FLUZONE HD] in october and then a second dose at the end of december with no reported adverse event. The patient's past medical history, medical treatment(s), vaccination(s) and family history were not provided. On an unknown date in October 2025, the patient received a dose 1 of suspect INFLUENZA USP TRIVAL A-B HIGH DOSE SUBVIRION VACCINE Suspension for injection in pre-filled syringe (strength, expiry date and lot number not reported for both regimens) via unknown route in unknown administration site as . On an unknown date in December 2025, also received a dose 2 of same vaccine via unknown route in unknown administration site for prophylactic vaccination (immunization) with no reported adverse event (extra dose administered) (same day latency). Information regarding batch number and expiration date corresponding to the one at time of event occurrence was requested. Action taken: not applicable. This suspected adverse reaction report is submitted and classified as a medication error solely and exclusively to ensure the marketing authorization holder's compliance with the requirements set out in the Directive 2001/83/EC and Module VI of the Good Pharmacovigilance Practices. The classification as a medical error is in no way intended, nor should it be interpreted or construed as an allegation or claim made by the marketing authorization holder that any third party has contributed to or is to be held liable for the occurrence of this medication error.