Received Mar 9, 2026
| Type | Name | Manufacturer | Dose | Lot | Route / Site |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VARZOS | ZOSTER (NO BRAND NAME) | UNKNOWN MANUFACTURER | 1 | UNK | — |
Had the one only should have had another three to four years later and got the shingles; This non-serious case was reported by a consumer via interactive digital media and described the occurrence of shingles in a patient who received Herpes zoster (Shingles vaccine) for prophylaxis. On an unknown date, the patient received the 1st dose of Shingles vaccine. On an unknown date, an unknown time after receiving Shingles vaccine, the patient experienced shingles (Verbatim: Had the one only should have had another three to four years later and got the shingles). The outcome of the shingles was not reported. It was unknown if the reporter considered the shingles to be related to Shingles vaccine. It was unknown if the company considered the shingles to be related to Shingles vaccine. Additional Information: GSK Receipt Date: 28-FEB-2026 This case was reported by a patient via interactive digital media. The reporter reported that those two shots are but for ever. The patient believe that have to get another two maybe after six to eight years after, had all the shots. Had the one only should have had another three to four years later and got the shingles. The reporter would not wish on the worst enemy and had a light case, then when the new one came out had that. The reporter thought it was time to get the shots again, hit them seven years ago, but need them again. Not forever, they said the same thing about the first one and they were wrong. The batch number was not provided and we and unable to contact the reporter.