VAERS Explorer
Back to explore

Report #2889530

Received Mar 18, 2026

A note on interpretation. VAERS reports are unverified and may be incomplete or coincidental. A report does not establish that a vaccine caused an event, and counts should not be used to calculate incidence or infer causation. Full disclaimer

Overview

Sex
Female
Age
Age unknown
State
LA
Recovered
Unknown
Vaccinated
Aug 19, 2025
Onset
Days to onset
Hospital days

Vaccines (1)

TypeNameManufacturerDoseLotRoute / Site
TYPTYPHOID LIVE ORAL TY21A (VIVOTIF)BERNA BIOTECH, LTD.13004299PO / MO

Symptoms (1)

Product administration error

Symptom narrative

The patient took Vivotif after having some food; Case reference number US-BN-2025-001430 is a spontaneous case initially received from a nurse via Communication (reference number: USBAV25-2088) on 20-Aug-2025 and concerns a female patient of unspecified age. The patient's medical history and concomitant medication details were not provided. On 19-Aug-2025, the patient took the first dose of Vivotif after having some food (batch number: 3004299), at unknown dose, orally for indication pre travel (explicitly coded as: 'product administration error'). At the time of the initial report, it was unknown if the patient experience any of adverse events due to Vivotif. No further information was provided.; Reporter's Comments: A female patient of unspecified age took the first dose of Vivotif after having some food, for indication pre travel, which is considered as product administration error. It was unknown if the patient experienced any of adverse events due to Vivotif. Product administration error is considered as listed per company convention. The patient's medical history and concomitant medication details were not provided. Product administration error is not related to the suspect vaccine, but to a human factor. This case is considered as non-serious.; Sender's Comments: A female patient of unspecified age took the first dose of Vivotif after having some food, for indication pre travel, which is considered as product administration error. It was unknown if the patient experienced any of adverse events due to Vivotif. Product administration error is considered as listed per company convention. The patient's medical history and concomitant medication details were not provided. Product administration error is not related to the suspect vaccine, but to a human factor. This case is considered as non-serious.

Medical history

Comments: None