Report #2889610

Overview

Sex

Female

Age

Age unknown

State

—

Recovered

Unknown

Vaccinated

—

Onset

—

Days to onset

—

Hospital days

—

Symptoms (1)

Symptom narrative

The patient took four doses of Vivotif capsule with food; Case reference number US-BN-2025-000862 is a spontaneous case initially received from a consumer via agency (reference number: USBAV25-0915) on 23-Apr-2025 and concerns a female patient of unknown age. The patient's medical history and concomitant medications were not provided. On unspecified date, reported as a week and a half ago, the patient took with food four doses of Vivotif (batch number: unknown) at a dose of one capsule, orally for indication reported as travel. As reported, the patient preparing to travel and completed the Vivotif vaccine and was instructed that she could eat with it (explicitly coded as 'product administration error'). At the time of the initial report, it was unknown if the patient experienced any adverse event due to Vivotif. No further information was provided.; Reporter's Comments: A female patient of unspecified age took four doses of Vivotif with food for indication travel, which is considered as product administration error. It was unknown if patient experienced any adverse events due to Vivotif. Product administration error is considered as listed per company convention. The patient's medical history and concomitant medication details were not provided. Product administration error is not related to the suspect vaccine, but to a human factor. This case is considered as non-serious.; Sender's Comments: A female patient of unspecified age took four doses of Vivotif with food for indication travel, which is considered as product administration error. It was unknown if patient experienced any adverse events due to Vivotif. Product administration error is considered as listed per company convention. The patient's medical history and concomitant medication details were not provided. Product administration error is not related to the suspect vaccine, but to a human factor. This case is considered as non-serious.

Medical history

Comments: None