VAERS Explorer
Back to explore

Report #2889651

Received Mar 18, 2026

A note on interpretation. VAERS reports are unverified and may be incomplete or coincidental. A report does not establish that a vaccine caused an event, and counts should not be used to calculate incidence or infer causation. Full disclaimer

Overview

Sex
Male
Age
Age unknown
State
VA
Recovered
Unknown
Vaccinated
Jun 10, 2025
Onset
Days to onset
Hospital days

Vaccines (1)

TypeNameManufacturerDoseLotRoute / Site
TYPTYPHOID LIVE ORAL TY21A (VIVOTIF)BERNA BIOTECH, LTD.2Unknown

Symptoms (1)

Inappropriate schedule of product administration

Symptom narrative

The patient took the second dose of Vivotif 19 days after first dose; Case reference number US-BN-2025-001132 is a spontaneous case initially received from nurse via Communication (reference number: USBAV25-1576) on 30-Jun-2025 and concerns a male patient of unspecified age. The patient's medical history and concomitant medication details were not provided. On 10-Jun-2025, the patient took first doses of Vivotif (batch number: unknown) at unknown dose, route or site of administration for unknown indication. On 29-Jun-2025, 19 days after first dose, the patient took second dose of Vivotif (batch number: unknown) at unknown dose, route or site of administration (explicitly coded as 'inappropriate schedule of product administered'). At the time of the initial report, it was unknown if patient experienced any adverse events due to Vivotif. No further information provided.; Reporter's Comments: A male patient of unspecified age took the second dose of Vivotif on the day 19 after the first dose, which is considered as inappropriate schedule of product administered. It was unknown if patient experienced any adverse events due to Vivotif. Inappropriate schedule of product administration is considered as listed per company convention. The patient's medical history and concomitant medication details were not provided. Inappropriate schedule of product administration is not related to the suspect vaccine, but to a human factor. This case is considered as non-serious.; Sender's Comments: A male patient of unspecified age took the second dose of Vivotif on the day 19 after the first dose, which is considered as inappropriate schedule of product administered. It was unknown if patient experienced any adverse events due to Vivotif. Inappropriate schedule of product administration is considered as listed per company convention. The patient's medical history and concomitant medication details were not provided. Inappropriate schedule of product administration is not related to the suspect vaccine, but to a human factor. This case is considered as non-serious.

Medical history

Comments: None.