VAERS Explorer
Back to explore

Report #2892152

Received Apr 8, 2026

Office visit
A note on interpretation. VAERS reports are unverified and may be incomplete or coincidental. A report does not establish that a vaccine caused an event, and counts should not be used to calculate incidence or infer causation. Full disclaimer

Overview

Sex
Unknown
Age
Age unknown
State
Recovered
Unknown
Vaccinated
Onset
Days to onset
Hospital days

Vaccines (1)

TypeNameManufacturerDoseLotRoute / Site
VARZOSZOSTER (NO BRAND NAME)UNKNOWN MANUFACTURERUNKUNK

Symptoms (1)

Unevaluable event

Symptom narrative

had a really bad reaction to that vaccine/had to treat me for the allergic reaction; This non-serious case was reported by a consumer via interactive digital media and described the occurrence of allergic reaction in a patient who received Herpes zoster (Shingles vaccine) for prophylaxis. On an unknown date, the patient received Shingles vaccine. On an unknown date, an unknown time after receiving Shingles vaccine, the patient experienced allergic reaction (Verbatim: had a really bad reaction to that vaccine/had to treat me for the allergic reaction). The outcome of the allergic reaction was not reported. The reporter considered the allergic reaction to be related to Shingles vaccine. The company considered the allergic reaction to be related to Shingles vaccine. Additional Information: GSK receipt date 28-MAR-2026 This case was reported by a consumer via interactive digital media. The patient had a really bad reaction to that vaccine. The patient only took it because doctor said she/he was noncompliant. And then doctor had to treat the patient for the allergic reaction. The batch number was not provided, and we are unable to contact the reporter.