VAERS Explorer
Back to explore

Report #2896085

Received May 11, 2026

A note on interpretation. VAERS reports are unverified and may be incomplete or coincidental. A report does not establish that a vaccine caused an event, and counts should not be used to calculate incidence or infer causation. Full disclaimer

Overview

Sex
Male
Age
Age unknown
State
CA
Recovered
Unknown
Vaccinated
Apr 12, 2026
Onset
Apr 12, 2026
Days to onset
0
Hospital days

Vaccines (1)

TypeNameManufacturerDoseLotRoute / Site
UNKVACCINE NOT SPECIFIED (NO BRAND NAME)UNKNOWN MANUFACTURERUNKU8823DAIM / RA

Symptoms (2)

No adverse eventProduct storage issue

Symptom narrative

excursion happened on 8APR2026, and 1 dose was administered on 12APR2026, with no reported adverse event; Initial information received on 27-Apr-2026 regarding an unsolicited valid non-serious case received from other or unknown health care professional (HCP). This case involves a 48-year-old male patient who received Influenza Trivalent Recombinant Vaccine [Flublok] which was exposed to an excursion due to new fridge was not regulating the temperature very well and it got too cold where Highest/lowest temperature reached 30.9 Fahrenheit for 15 minutes, with no reported adverse event. The patient's past medical history, past drugs, vaccination(s), family history, and concomitant medications were not provided. On 12-Apr-2026, the patient received 0.5 mL dose (once) of Influenza Trivalent Recombinant Vaccine, Solution for injection of unknown strength (batch: U8823DA, expiration date: 31-May-2026) via intramuscular route in the right arm for Influenza [Influenza Immunisation], which was exposed to an excursion due to new fridge was not regulating the temperature very well and it got too cold where Highest/lowest temperature reached 30.9 Fahrenheit for 15 minutes, with no reported adverse event. [Poor quality product administered] [latency: same day]. It was reported that, "this excursion did not occur due to a human error, extended stability data did not cover the excursion. Previous excursion: at 50.70F for 9 Hours." Action taken: not applicable. This suspected adverse reaction report is submitted and classified as a medication error solely and exclusively to ensure the marketing authorization holder's compliance with the requirements set out in the Directive 2001/83/EC and Module VI of the Good Pharmacovigilance Practices. The classification as a medical error is in no way intended, nor should it be interpreted or construed as an allegation or claim made by the marketing authorization holder that any third party has contributed to or is to be held liable for the occurrence of this medication error.